HKSAR v. Chan Yee Lap

Read the full judgment text of CACC 30/2013 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 6 September 2013.

1. The hearing today was to have been the applicant’s renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence, his application having initially been refused by a single Justice of Appeal on 7 June 2013.

Cited by 9 cases

Case No.CACC 30/2013
Court
Court of Appeal
Date06 Sep 2013
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC 30/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 30 OF 2013

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC NO. 443 OF 2012)

________________________

BETWEEN

  HKSAR Respondent
  and
  CHAN YEE LAP(陳宜立) Applicant

________________________

Before: Hon Fok, Lunn JJA and Macrae J in Court
Date of Hearing: 6 September 2013
Date of Judgment: 6 September 2013

________________________

J U D G M E N T

________________________

Hon Fok JA (giving the Judgment of the Court):

1.The hearing today was to have been the applicant’s renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence, his application having initially been refused by a single Justice of Appeal on 7 June 2013.

2.However, late yesterday afternoon (at around 5.45 pm), the Court received a fax from the applicant, via the Commissioner of Correctional Services, containing a Form VII under the Criminal Procedure Rules.  That form on its face only mentions an intention to abandon the application for leave to appeal against conviction but there is attached to the fax a handwritten letter in which the applicant indicates his intention and makes a request to abandon his application for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence.  Today, he has also confirmed that this is his intention.

3.In the circumstances, the application before us today, for leave to appeal against both conviction and sentence, are accordingly dismissed.

(Joseph Fok)
Justice of Appeal
(Michael Lunn)
Justice of Appeal
(Andrew Macrae)
Judge of the
Court of First Instance

Mr Edmond Lee SADPP, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent

The Applicant, in person

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACC 30/2013