Komal Patel and Others v. Chris Au and Others

Case No.HCA 183/2014

Court

High Court CFI

Date11 Jul 2014

Judge—

Case Document

100%Judiciary

HCA 183/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 183 OF 2014

_____________________

BETWEEN

	KOMAL PATEL	1^st Plaintiff
	JASON MARK COHEN	2^nd Plaintiff
	HARILAOS APOSTOLIDES	3^rd Plaintiff
	ROCKY CAPE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED	4^th Plaintiff
	and
	CHRIS AU	1^st Defendant
	HO CHING YI ELSA	2^nd Defendant
	RETRIBUTION LIMITED	3^rd Defendant

(BY ORIGINAL ACTION)

_____________________

AND BETWEEN

	CHRIS AU	1^st Plaintiff
	and
	KOMAL PATEL	1^st Defendant
	JASON MARK COHEN	2^nd Defendant
	HARILAOS APOSTOLIDES	3^rd Defendant
	ROCKY CAPE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED	4^th Defendant
	ESSENCE INVESTMENTS LIMITED	5th Defendant
	YEW KUAN CHEONG	6th Defendant
	RETRIBUTION LIMITED	7th Defendant

(BY COUNTERCLAIM)

_____________________

Before: Hon Zervos J in Chambers

Dates of Hearing: 30 April and 2, 7 and 9 May 2014

Date of Written Submissions on Directions: 11 July 2014

Date of Judgment: 11 July 2014

Date of Corrigendum: 14 July 2014

_____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

_____________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 11 July 2014:

1.In paragraph 40, in the second sentence “and non-contractual interference” should read “and/or contractual interference”.

2.The sentence in paragraph 63 should be inserted at the end of paragraph 56.

3.In paragraph 82, delete the word “However,” from the commencement of the second sentence.

4.In paragraph 97, in the first sentence “restitution” should read “Retribution”.

5.In paragraph 101(3), the last sentence should read “It is argued by the plaintiffs that this is warranted given…”

6.In paragraph 105(3), the first sentence should read “There would be no apparent detriment to the defendants if they are restrained as requested, bearing in mind…”