Mimi Kar Kee Wong Hung (also known as Mimi Kar Gee Wong Hung) v. Raymond Kin Sang Hung

Read the full judgment text of FACV 10/2014 on BabelCite. This FACV judgment was delivered on 18 May 2015.

1. the first sentence “… , quite apart from aspects giving to the fairness of such an order,…” should read “…, quite apart from aspects going to the fairness of such an order,…” .

Case No.FACV 10/2014
Court
FACV
Date18 May 2015
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

FACV Nos. 10 & 11 of 2014
FACV No.10 of 2014

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

FINAL APPEAL NO.10 OF 2014 (CIVIL)

(ON APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 197 OF 2012)

_______________________

Between  
  MIMI KAR KEE WONG HUNG
(also known as MIMI KAR GEE WONG HUNG)
Petitioner
(Respondent)
  And
  RAYMOND KIN SANG HUNG Respondent
(Appellant)

_______________________

FACV No.11 of 2014

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

FINAL APPEAL NO. 11 OF 2014 (CIVIL)

(ON APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 197 OF 2012)

Between

  MIMI KAR KEE WONG HUNG
(also known as MIMI KAR GEE WONG HUNG)
Petitioner
(Appellant)
  And
  RAYMOND KIN SANG HUNG Respondent
(Respondent)
_______________________

Before: Chief Justice Ma, Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ,Mr Justice Chan NPJ, Mr Justice Stock NPJ,Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe NPJ

Date of Hearing and Judgment: 16 April 2015

Date of Reasons for Judgment: 18 May 2015

Date of Corrigendum: 4 June 2015

___________________________

CORRIGENDUM
___________________________

Please note the following amendment in the Reasons for Judgment dated 18 May 2015:

On page 23 at paragraph 39:

1.the first sentence “… , quite apart from aspects giving to the fairness of such an order,…” should read “…, quite apart from aspects going to the fairness of such an order,…” .

  (Phoebe Tse)
  for Registrar, CFA