Read the full judgment text of FCMC 1243/2012 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment was delivered on 7 July 2016 before 區域法院暫委法官彭家光.
Family law – Ancillary relief – Leave to appeal – New evidence – Ladd v Marshall – District Court Ordinance (Cap 336) s.63A – Application dismissed – Costs. The Petitioner (Male) applied for leave to appeal against a judgment dated 22 April 2016 regarding ancillary relief, including maintenance and property orders. He claimed financial hardship, alleged asset concealment by the Respondent, and domestic violence. He submitted new evidence without court leave. The Court rejected the new evidence as it did not meet the Ladd v Marshall criteria. The Court found no reasonable prospect of success for the appeal under Cap 336 s.63A. The application was dismissed with costs awarded to the Respondent.
Legal issues: Admissibility of new evidence · Granting leave to appeal
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Cites 1 case