Read the full judgment text of FAMC 15/2024 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment.
1. This is the Determination of the Appeal Committee. The applicant was charged with uttering seditious words contrary to section 10(1)(b) of the Crimes Ordinance (“ CO ”). [1] He was convicted before HH Judge Stanley Chan [2] and his appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal [3] which then certified [4] the following questions:
Cited by 4 cases · Cites 3 cases