Read the full judgment text of HCMA 001102/1999 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 18 February 2000.
1. The 1st, 2nd and 3rd appellants were charged with operating a gambling establishment and the 4th and 5th appellants were charged with assisting in the operation of a gambling establishment, contrary to ss.5(a) and 5(c) respectively of the Gambling Ordinance, Cap.148. They pleaded guilty to the respective charges and were convicted by the learned magistrate. For the 1st, 2nd and 3rd appellants, they were sentenced to a term of four months and the other two appellants were sentenced to a term o
Cited by 6 cases