Read the full judgment text of FAMC 000064/2004 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment was delivered on 11 January 2005.
1. The applicant was convicted of fraud, contrary to s.16A(1)(b) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210, for having, as the magistrate had found, deliberately and dishonestly understated his financial debts and his monthly repayments in order to obtain a loan from a financial company. He did not give evidence at the trial but in his statements to the police which were produced in court, he said he had disclosed all his debts but the staff (PW1) who processed his application for the loan had, for some
Cited by 3 cases