Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 000309/2005 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 12 February 2007.
1. There is no dispute between the parties that the trial has to be adjourned today. The consolidated action involved three defendants. The 3rd defendant in the consolidated action were the occupiers of the subject premises. The claim against the 3rd defendant began life as an originating summons under Order 113 of the Rules of the District Court, which was served on the 2nd and 3rd defendants of the now consolidated action. The 3rd defendant did not file any acknowledgement of service.