Read the full judgment text of FACC 4/2012 on BabelCite. This FACC judgment was delivered on 26 July 2013.
1. I agree with the judgment of Mr Justice Tang PJ. For the reasons given by him, the “proprietor” charges against the appellants in these two appeals should be set aside but the “contractor” charges should be upheld. I would however say a few words on the proprietor charge.
Cited by 1 case