Read the full judgment text of FACC 3/2016 on BabelCite. This FACC judgment was delivered on 9 November 2016.
1. The appellant was convicted of one charge of dealing with property known or reasonably believed to represent proceeds of an indictable offence contrary to section 25(1) of the Organised and Serious Crimes Ordinance. [1] Her application for leave to appeal to this Court against that conviction was heard on 22 March 2016, prior to the Court hearing the appeals in Yeung . [2] In the light of those pending appeals, the Appeal Committee granted leave to appeal on the substantial and grave injustic
Cites 5 cases