HKSAR v. Fu Chi on and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 460/2021 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 July 2022.

1. Page 11, lines C to D, “…… 彩盈村彩康樓……” should read

Cited by 7 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMA 460/2021[2022] HKCFI 1895
Court
High Court CFI
Date15 Jul 2022
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

[English Translation – 英譯本]

HCMA 460/2021

[2022] HKCFI 1895

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO 460 OF 2021

(ON APPEAL FROM KTCC 1146 OF 2020)

___________________

BETWEEN
HKSAR Respondent
and
FU Chi On 1st Appellant (D1)
(formerly 1st Defendant)
CHAN Cho Lam Clara 2nd Appellant (D2)
(formerly 5th Defendant)
LEE Ming Hin 3rd Appellant (D3)
(formerly 6th Defendant)
LAU Ka Ho 4th Appellant (D4)
(formerly 7th Defendant)

___________________

Before: Hon Wong J in Court
Dates of Hearing: 13 and 16 May 2022
Date of Judgment: 15 July 2022

CORRIGENDA

Please note the following corrigenda in the Judgment handed down by the Hon Wong J on 15 July 2022:

1.Page 11, lines C to D, “…… 彩盈村彩康樓……” should read

“…… 彩盈村盈康樓……”

2.Page 30, line J, “……唯一合理證據。” should read“……唯一合理推論。”

  (Mika Lai)
  for the Registrar of the High Court

Dated this 15th day of April 2024