HKSAR v. Cheng Kam Wah
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 1204/2002 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 14 January 2003.
1. This is an appeal against sentence. The appellant was sentenced to 6 months imprisonment following his plea of guilty to theft. He had stolen 8 bottles of shampoo from Mannings. He has 24 previous convictions of which 13 are the theft.
Cited by 7 cases
|
HCMA001204/2002 HCMA 1204/2002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 1204 OF 2002 (ON APPEAL FROM ESCC 3432/2002) ____________
____________ Coram: Deputy High Court Judge Line in Court Date of Hearing: 14 January 2003 Date of Judgment: 14 January 2003 _______________ J U D G M E N T _______________ 1.This is an appeal against sentence. The appellant was sentenced to 6 months imprisonment following his plea of guilty to theft. He had stolen 8 bottles of shampoo from Mannings. He has 24 previous convictions of which 13 are the theft. 2.The Magistrate took a starting point of 9 months. That was higher than usual but it reflected the fact that this was an habitual offender who chooses to steal shampoo he can resell for money. 3.In my judgment, the Magistrate was fully entitled to take 9 months for the starting point on these facts for this man. The greater starting point is not disproportionate to the mischief of the crime. He gave a full 1/3 discount for the plea of guilty and the resulting sentence of 6 months imprisonment is one that I judge to be just in the circumstances. 4.Accordingly, I confirm the sentence passed by the Magistrate.
Representation: Ms Jasmine Ching, GC, Department of Justice, for HKSAR Appellant: Cheng Kam Wah, in person |
Other judgments that cite this case