Read the full judgment text of FACV 7/2013 on BabelCite. This FACV judgment was delivered on 18 February 2014.
1. The first three Appellants (GA, FI and JA) are mandated refugees and the fourth Appellant (PA) is a screened-in torture claimant. The issue in these appeals, broadly put, is whether a right to work exists in Hong Kong insofar as persons in these categories are concerned.
Cited by 11 cases · Cites 3 cases