Read the full judgment text of DCCC 139/2016 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 29 July 2016.
1. 被告人經審訊後被裁定一項外出時備有偷竊用的物品（第一項控罪）及一項攜帶仿製火器意圖犯可逮捕的罪行（第三項控罪）罪名成立。至於在公眾地方管有攻擊性武器的控罪（第二項控罪）則罪名不成立。
Cited by 1 case · Cites 2 cases