Read the full judgment text of DCCC 107/2017 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 16 August 2017.
1. The defendant stands convicted after trial of one charge of arson being reckless as to whether property would be damaged and being reckless as to whether lives of others would be endangered, contrary to sections 60 (2) and (3) and 63 (1) of the Crimes Ordinance [1] .
Cited by 4 cases · Cites 9 cases