Read the full judgment text of CACC 000076/1998 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 14 May 1998.
1. This Applicant pleaded not guilty originally at his trial in the District Court to alternative charges of arson, alleging that he either committed arson with intention to endanger life or being reckless as to whether the life of another would be endangered. The particulars of these offences make this clear, although the usual form of this indictment should also have shown this in the Statement of Offence. For some reason this was overlooked although it has no bearing on this appeal.
Cited by 41 cases