Read the full judgment text of CACC 262/2017 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 22 June 2018.
1. The 2 nd and 3 rd applicants (D1 and D2 at trial respectively) faced a number of charges of trafficking in a dangerous drug, contrary to section 4(1)(a) and (3) of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Cap 134. Whilst the 2 nd applicant pleaded guilty to the charges he faced (namely, Charges 1, 2 (with the 3 rd applicant) and 6 (with D3), the 3 rd applicant pleaded not guilty to Charge 2, the only charge he faced. Accordingly, he stood trial alone before Deputy Judge A Yim (“the judge”) in the Distr
Cited by 15 cases · Cites 7 cases