Read the full judgment text of DCCC 353/2012 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 5 July 2012.
1. D1 is a Chinese national. D2 is a Philippine national. D1 departed Hong Kong for Manila by using a forged Philippine passport (3 rd Charge), and making a false representation of its contents to the Immigration Assistant (4 th Charge). They had also conspired with others to obtain air travel services by falsely representing to the airline staff that D1 was the genuine holder of a Philippine passport (5 th Charge). D2, who could speak English and the Philippine dialect, assisted D1 in each
Cited by 1 case · Cites 6 cases