Read the full judgment text of CACV 241/2012 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 1 November 2013.
1. These two appeals deal with a common issue, namely, the construction of Regulation 56 of Table A of the First Schedule of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32). Specifically the issue is whether the word ‘members’ in Regulation 56 should be construed in the context of the case as ‘one member’. Harris J held that it should be so constructed and found in favour of the applicant (‘Mr Koo’). The 1 st respondent (‘Mr Hung’) now appeals.
Cited by 10 cases · Cites 2 cases