Read the full judgment text of CAAR 12/2022 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 2 June 2023.
1. The respondent originally faced an indictment alleging two counts of trafficking in a dangerous drug together with her husband, Daniel Do (“Do”), contrary to section 4(1)(a) and (3) of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Cap 134 (Counts 1 and 3); to which indictment was subsequently added [1] an alternative count to Count 1 of doing an act tending and intended to pervert the course of public justice, contrary to Common Law and punishable under section 101I(1) of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance, C
Cited by 5 cases · Cites 2 cases