Read the full judgment text of CACC 476/2011 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 9 March 2012.
1. The applicant was charged with one count of trafficking in a dangerous drug, contrary to section 4(1)(a) and (3) of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Cap. 134. He pleaded not guilty to the charge before Deputy Judge Sham in the District Court but pleaded guilty to possession of a dangerous drug, contrary to section 8(1)(a) and (2) of the said Ordinance. The prosecution no longer proceeded with the trafficking charge, and the summary of facts was amended by deleting the phrase which stated that
Cites 3 cases