Read the full judgment text of FACV 10/2011 on BabelCite. This FACV judgment was delivered on 2 April 2012.
1. The second applicant is now a resident of Hong Kong, but this was not her status at the time the present judicial review proceedings commenced in 2007. At that time, the second applicant was representative of a number of women from the Mainland bearing the following similarities: she was married to a Hong Kong resident, held a Two-Way Permit (the permit issued by the Mainland authorities enabling a Mainland resident to visit Hong Kong up to a maximum of 90 days) and was in the course of appl
Cited by 7 cases