Read the full judgment text of CACC 428/2014 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 8 May 2015.
1. In the hearing before Judge G Lam, the 1 st and 2 nd applicants were referred to respectively as “D13” and “D17” in a District Court case involving multiple defendants and multiple charges. Acting in person, the 1st applicant, who was convicted after trial, sought leave to appeal against his conviction of one charge (Charge 6) of acting as a member of a triad society, contrary to section 20(2) of the Societies Ordinance, Cap 151, and with the assistance of counsel, sought leave to appeal agai
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case