Read the full judgment text of CACC 377/2015 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 29 July 2016.
1. The applicant faced three charges of dealing with property known or believed to represent proceeds of an indictable offence, contrary to section 25(1) and (3) of the Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance, Cap 455 (Charges 1 to 3); and one charge of attempting to deal with property known or believed to represent proceeds of an indictable offence, contrary to the same provision and section 159G of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap 200 (Charge 4). The applicant pleaded not guilty to all charges. On 1
Cites 3 cases