HKSAR v. Rahman Md Sheikh Mojibur
Read the full judgment text of CACC 333/2018 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 13 January 2020 before Macrae VP, Yuen JA and McWalters JA.
Criminal law – appeal – corrigendum – typographical errors – whether references to 'applicant' in the judgment should be corrected to 'respondent' – amendments made in paragraphs 19, 22 and 26 of the Court of Appeal judgment dated 13 January 2020 – corrigendum dated 14 January 2020 – Registrar signed by Kitty Leung – no substantive change to the judgment.
Outcome: Corrigendum issued to amend typographical errors in the Court of Appeal judgment dated 13 January 2020.
Cited by 16 cases · Cites 1 case
|
CACC 333 /2018 [2020] HKCA 53 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 333 OF 2018 (ON APPEAL FROM DCCC NO 619 OF 2017) ________________________ BETWEEN
________________________ Before: Hon Macrae VP, Yuen JA and McWalters JA in Court Date of Hearing: 26 November 2019 Date of Judgment: 13 January 2020 Date of Corrigendum: 14 January 2020 ________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ________________________ Please note the following amendments in the Judgment dated 13 January 2020: On page 9 at paragraph 19, “… the applicant’s primary source of funds…” should read “… the respondent’s primary source of funds…”. On page 11 at paragraph 22, “… the applicant was not completely silent …” should read “… the respondent was not completely silent…”. On page 13 at paragraph 26, “… the applicant not to disclose…” should read “… the respondent not to disclose…”. Dated this 14th day of January, 2020.
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACC 333/2018