Read the full judgment text of DCCC 86/2015 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 16 March 2015.
1. The defendant pleaded guilty to four charges relating to counterfeit notes, namely one charge of counterfeiting notes with intent (Charge 1); one charge of having custody or control of counterfeiting materials and implements with intent (Charge 2); and two charges of passing or tendering a counterfeit note (Charges 3 and 4), all of the aforesaid charges are brought under the Crimes Ordinance, Cap 200.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 5 cases