Read the full judgment text of DCCC 160/2016 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. At the outset, the Defendants were jointly charged with the first two counts of theft, contrary to Section 9 of the Theft Ordinance, Cap. 210, D1 and D4 were jointly charged with Count 3 of theft, contrary to Section 9 of the Theft Ordinance, Cap. 210. The Prosecution sought leave to withdraw Count 2 against D3, to withdraw the original Count 3 against D4 and lay an amended Count 3 against D1 of handling stolen goods, contrary to Section 24 of the Theft Ordinance, Cap. 210 and to lay an addit
Cites 2 cases