Read the full judgment text of CACC 377/2012 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 26 April 2013.
1. The applicant was D1 (of three defendants) in the trial. He was charged with six Counts of robbery, contrary to section 10(1) and (2) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210. He was charged alone for the 1 st Count but jointly charged with D2 in 6 th Count; and with D3 in 2 nd , 3 rd , 4 th and 5 th Count.
Cited by 14 cases · Cites 2 cases