HKSAR v. Cheung To Ming
|
CACC 406/2005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 406 OF 2005 (ON APPEAL FROM DCCC NO. 507 OF 2005) ---------------------- BETWEEN
-------------------- Before : Hon Stock JA in Court Dates of Hearing : 10 February 2006 Date of Judgment : 10 February 2006 ------------------------ J U D G M E N T ------------------------ Hon Stock JA: 1.Looking at the facts of this particular case and also at the photographs which I have seen, it seems that the intention was clearly to obtain a meal in a building which was not domestic and was not occupied. The description of ransacking gives an impression that is, perhaps, not borne out by the photographs. It seems to me that in these circumstances the Court of Appeal should inquire whether a total of 35 months’ imprisonment on these pleas of guilty is or is not manifestly excessive. Accordingly, I shall grant the applicant leave to appeal against sentence. The photographs should be made part of the appeal bundle.
Miss Anna YK Lai SGC of the Department of Justice for the Respondent Applicant, Cheung To Ming, in person |
HKSAR v. Mok Tsz Kin
HKSAR v. Tsang Chun Yin
香港特別行政區 訴 张春虎
香港特別行政區 訴 張偉達及另一人
HKSAR v. Thapa Kishan
HKSAR v. Lau Hak Kan
HKSAR v. Chan Yin Ho
HKSAR v. Sumiya Bolortuul
HKSAR v. Jamshied Muhammad (also known as Muhammad Jamshied, Muhammad Jamsfied and Muhammed Jamshied)
HKSAR v. Kan Ming-cheong
HKSAR v. Cheung Wing Kin
HKSAR v. Xiong Jiajia
HKSAR v. Lee Ho Kong and Another
HKSAR v. Ho Van Hach (also known as Ho Man Wah and Ho Van Hack)
HKSAR v. Matulin Jill Labonita
HKSAR v. So Chi Kin
香港特別行政區 訴 胡少舉
HKSAR v. Lam Chi Wai and Others
HKSAR v. Chan Wing Lun
HKSAR v. Ng Man Tang
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACC 406/2005