Read the full judgment text of CACC 67/2012 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 2 May 2014.
1. The applicant pleaded guilty before Deputy District Judge Sham (as he then was) to 8 charges of ‘dealing with property known or believed to represent the proceeds of an indictable offence’, contrary to section 25(1) and (3) of the Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance, Cap 455 Laws of Hong Kong (Charges 1 to 8), and 12 charges of ‘fraud’, contrary to section 16A of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210 Laws of Hong Kong (Charges 9 to 20).
Cited by 13 cases · Cites 9 cases