Read the full judgment text of FCMC 9187/2016 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment was delivered on 18 December 2009 before 區域法院暫委法官彭家光.
Family Law – Property Dispute – Beneficial Ownership – Common Intention Constructive Trust – Resulting Trust – Burden of Proof – Costs – 婚姻法 – 財產爭議 – 實益擁有權 – 共同意願法律構定信託 – 歸復信託 – 舉證責任 – 訴訟費用 – 本案涉及兩項物業（錦泰苑及映灣園 38C）的實益擁有權爭議，物業登記在答辯人名下。介入人（答辯人之女）聲稱根據共同意願法律構定信託及歸復信託擁有實益權益。法庭裁定介入人未能證明共同意願或經濟貢獻，申索被駁回。介入人須支付呈請人訟費。
Legal issues: Common Intention Constructive Trust · Resulting Trust · Burden of Proof
Outcome: Interveners' claims dismissed. Divorce order not yet granted.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 4 cases