Read the full judgment text of FCMC 6517/2021 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment was delivered on 28 March 2024 before 區域法院暫委法官李懷德.
Leave to appeal – Ancillary relief – District Court Ordinance s.63A(2) – Ladd v Marshall – Costs – Petitioner absent from trial – Leave refused – Costs awarded to Respondent – Petitioner claimed lack of notice, financial inability, contributions, and adopted child – Court found notice properly served, financial claim unsupported, new evidence inadmissible – Application dismissed with costs.
Legal issues: Leave to appeal standard · Service of notice · Financial capacity · New evidence · Costs
Outcome: Leave to appeal refused. Application dismissed. Costs awarded to Respondent.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 5 cases