Read the full judgment text of FACC 17/2018 on BabelCite. This 終審法院 judgment was delivered on 5 December 2019 before 馬道立, 霍兆剛, 張舉能, 司徒敬, 范理申勳爵.
1. 2015年8月4日，上訴人Haresh Murlidhar Harjani在區域法院被裁定一項控罪罪名成立 [1] ，即他知道或有合理理由相信涉案財產代表從可公訴罪行的得益，而仍與其他人串謀處理該財產，違反法例第455章《有組織及嚴重罪行條例》第25(1)及(3)條及第200章《刑事罪行條例》第159A和159C條。他在2015年10月7日被判監禁3年零9個月。
Legal issues: Meaning of "有合理理由相信任何財產……代表任何人從可公訴罪行的得益" under s.25(1) OSCO · Relevance of defendant's actual belief in applying the statutory test · Relevance of "wilful blindness" in applying the statutory test · Existence of conspiracy to deal with property with reasonable grounds to believe under s.159A(2) · Conspiracy under s.159A(1)(a) when reasons for belief may not exist at time of dealing
Outcome: 上訴駁回
Cited by 76 cases · Cites 5 cases